Loading...
Loading...
Solutions
Assess more athletes, with the evidence attached to every judgement.
Every athlete arrives with structured evidence rather than a claim: performances tied to fixtures, video carrying when and where it was captured, documents carrying their issuer. You spend your time assessing rather than assembling a picture from fragments.
It does not remove judgement — it makes judgement comparable. Athletes are read against the same structured criteria for their sport and role, so two athletes seen by two different people on two different days can be placed side by side. Your assessment is recorded and attributed, becoming evidence itself.
A rating you cannot explain is not usable when someone asks why. SE-R™ and PGI™ each carry the reasoning that produced them, and the evidence behind a rating is immutable and versioned — so a recommendation you made months ago can still be defended against exactly what you saw.